Chicago stadiums, arenas and real estate make for a playground for the wealthy

We all love sports teams, but regular people don’t own the buildings or the land they frolic upon. We just pay homage to the teams — and to the power-laden who own them.

SHARE Chicago stadiums, arenas and real estate make for a playground for the wealthy
Rendering of a proposed new White Sox ballpark at The 78.

Rendering of a proposed new White Sox ballpark at The 78.

Related Midwest/Provided

I don’t know about you, but sometimes I feel as though there’s an entire world going on out there I know nothing about.

Take Chicago and stadiums. Take Chicago real estate, in general, and what goes with it.

I mean, where is that drill-shaped Chicago Spire that was to be 116 stories tall at 400 N. DuSable Lake Shore Drive? It’s just a fenced-off hole in the ground and has been since 2008. I remember watching that hole being dug. It was kind of cool.

And where is whatever’s supposed to be at Lincoln Yards, that mammoth development we’ve heard about forever? And what or who is Sterling Bay?

And what, if anything, is going on at the site of the former Michael Reese Hospital? And that vast South Works plot, where U.S. Steel once was?

So many questions. And that’s not even including items such as the usual aldermen on the take and fellows such as Ed Burke, the former chair of the Chicago City Council Finance Committee, the distinguished man recently found guilty of racketeering, bribery and extortion.

Burke was a partner with Klafter & Burke, a law firm that specializes in property-tax appeals. So he worked out bargains for clients on their real-estate ownings, including a guy named Donald J. Trump. That fellow, by the way, bought the land where the humble Sun-Times used to have its offices, and now we’ve got Trump Tower instead of a riverfront news organization there.

It’s a spiraling rabbit hole of confusion and greasy, interlocked fingers. And we, the public, are basically clueless.

New stadiums are all about real estate, tax givebacks and public funding. But without the land, they are nothing. And sometimes even having the land isn’t enough.

Head out to Arlington Heights, where the Bears bought the former Arlington International Racecourse for $197 million. Now the Bears say they can’t build there because of high property assessment. And nobody seems to mention that the Illinois Sports Facilities Authority — read: us — still owes a half-billion dollars on old Soldier Field and its renovations.

Of course, the White Sox, one of the most pathetic teams in baseball, are seeking a new stadium. And Sox chairman Jerry Reinsdorf would like the city and state to float bonds for around $1 billion to help out. Where would he put his stadium? In the spot called The 78 in the South Loop.

These teams come up with arcane financing mechanisms — call them ‘‘instruments’’ because that’s what they were called before they helped cause the 2008 mortgage crash that nearly destroyed the world’s economy — and we just look on with confusion. The powerful count on that.

It’s all free and wonderful — until it isn’t. I could bring up Mayor Richard M. Daley’s sale of our parking meters to a private company in 2008, in a deal so onerous it’s kind of incredible, but I won’t.

What really got me this time was the Sun-Times article Sunday by my colleagues Frank Main and Tim Novak, explaining how, for two decades, an Iraqi-British billionaire named Nadhmi Shakir Auchi, who once was barred from entering the United States, has been trying to develop The 78.

We’re talking about the 62 acres Auchi owns along the Chicago River south of the Loop. Valuable? A little. Auchi wasn’t allowed into the United States for years because of two criminal convictions, one in France and one in Iraq. The State Department cited unspecified ‘‘crimes of moral turpitude’’ for not giving him a visa.

You follow the story of The 78, and the names of people involved or circling the property through the years is stunning. Out pop former Mayors Daley, Rahm Emanuel and Lori Lightfoot and current Mayor Brandon Johnson. And then there’s convicted former Gov. Rod Blagojevich, former Gov. Bruce Rauner, convicted Tony Rezko, convicted Burke, Cook County Board president Toni Preckwinkle, casino owner Neil Bluhm, even former President Barack Obama, a candidate financially supported by some of these people. All these names circle, relevant to the property.

It’s a world of power that works deals, builds things and profits from them while we watch in eye-glazed torpor. The only thing a citizen needs to remember regarding life in this universe is that power and money trump all.

The rich get richer. And stadiums? We all love sports teams, but regular people don’t own the buildings or the land they frolic upon. We just pay homage to the teams — and to the power-laden who own them.

More coverage of the Bears' stadium plans
Latest Bears Stadium Updates
The Bears put the figure at $4.7 billion. But a state official says the tally to taxpayers goes even higher when you include the cost of refinancing existing debt.
The vision laid out by the Bears on Wednesday included detailed renderings of Museum Campus upgrades, including the conversion of Soldier Field to public parkland. But all that work would be paid for by taxpayers, not the team.
The USC quarterback, whom the Bears are expected to pick first in the NFL draft here on Thursday night, was clear that he’s prepared to play in cold temperatures in the NFL.
The plans, according to the team, will include additional green and open space with access to the lakefront and the Museum Campus, which Bears President Kevin Warren called “the most attractive footprint in the world.”
Gov. J.B. Pritzker brushed aside the latest proposal, which includes more than $2 billion in private funds but still requires taxpayer subsidies, saying it “isn’t one that I think the taxpayers are interested in getting engaged in.”
Fans said they liked the new amenities and features in the $4.7 billion stadium proposal unveiled Wednesday, although some worried the south lakefront could become even more congested than it is now.
Two additional infrastructure phases that would “maximize the site” and bring “additional opportunities for publicly owned amenities” could bring taxpayers’ tab to $1.5 billion over about five years, according to the team.
The final project would turn the current Soldier Field site into a park-like area, but that wouldn’t necessitate playing home games elsewhere during construction.
The Bears have hired political veteran Andrea Zopp to serve as a senior adviser on their legal team.
Gin Kilgore, acting executive director of Friends of the Parks, is not about to go along with what she called Bears President Kevin Warren’s “Buy now. This deal won’t last” sales pitch.
    Latest Columns and Commentary
    With all the important priorities the state has to tackle, why should Springfield rush to help the billionaire McCaskey family build a football stadium? The answer: They shouldn’t. The arguments so far don’t convince us this project would truly benefit the public.
    If these plans for new stadiums from the Bears, White Sox and Red Stars are going to have even a remote chance of passage, teams will have to drastically scale back their state asks and show some tangible benefits for state taxpayers.
    Not a dollar of taxpayer money went to the renovation of Wrigley Field and its current reinvigorated neighborhood, one reader points out.
    In exchange for billions of dollars in public money, the public deserves an ownership stake in the franchises.
    The city is willing to put private interests ahead of public benefit and cheer on a wrongheaded effort to build a massive domed stadium — that would be perfect for Arlington Heights — on Chicago’s lakefront.
    That the Bears can just diesel their way in, Bronko Nagurski-style, and attempt to set a sweeping agenda for the future of one of the world’s most iconic water frontages is more than a bit troubling.
    Based on what we’ve seen of the Bears plans so far, and given the lakefront’s civic importance, Mayor Johnson should steer the team to consider other locations in Chicago.
    The idea of two new stadiums and public funding should be a nonstarter.
    With a “financing partnership” between the two sports teams now in the works, Chicagoans know more about what they might be up against: Two wealthy sports teams joining forces to get huge taxpayer subsidies.
    We citizens shouldn’t fall prey to our teams’ brazen financial requests.

      New White Sox stadium coverage

      Plans for stadium in South Loop’s ‘The 78'

      Debate over public funding

      From the Editorial Board

      Columnists

      The Latest
      Officials say the project is the biggest ecological restoration project ever for the preserves.
      “Prisons exist to punish and rehabilitate people — not to torture and destroy them,” says the report from the Chicago Lawyers’ Committee for Civil Rights, which found that hundreds of people are kept in solitary confinement at any one time across the state.
      The Chicago native and his fellow master of sarcasm teamed up for an especially entertaining edition of “My Next Guest Needs No Introduction.”
      The alleged gunman fled into a nearby building and a SWAT team responded, police said.
      Dave Strobel caught and released his personal-best walleye Thursday at Heidecke Lake.